From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chick v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Apr 21, 1998
965 S.W.2d 475 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 73146

OPINION FILED: April 21, 1998

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONROE COUNTY, HONORABLE RONALD R. McKENZIE, JUDGE.

Gary Brotherton, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Daniel G. Cierpiot, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before Ahrens, P.J., Crandall and Karohl JJ., concurring.



ORDER


David B. Chick, Movant, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing. Movant pleaded guilty to four counts of forgery (Counts I II in Cause No. CR796-209FX and Counts I II in Cause No. CR796-253FX) in violation of section 570.090, RSMo 1994.

We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and concluded the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). A published opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b)(2). We have provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only. Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Chick v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Apr 21, 1998
965 S.W.2d 475 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Chick v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID B. CHICK, APPELLANT, vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE

Date published: Apr 21, 1998

Citations

965 S.W.2d 475 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)