From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chiang v. Afifi

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 10, 2024
24-cv-01665-AMO (N.D. Cal. May. 10, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-01665-AMO

05-10-2024

TINA CHIANG, Plaintiff, v. SABRINA AFIFI, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND CLOSING CASE RE: DKT. NO. 8

Araceli Martinez-Olguin United States District Judge.

This is an unlawful detainer action filed by Plaintiff Tina Chiang in Alameda County Superior Court against Defendant Sabrina Afifi. ECF 1. This is the third time Defendant has removed the same unlawful detainer action from state court. The two prior cases were both remanded to state court for lack of federal jurisdiction. Order Adopting Report and Recommendation and Remanding Case, Chiang v. Afifi, No. 23-cv-06235-JD (N.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2024), ECF No. 13; Remand Order, Chiang v. Afifi, No. 24-cv-01342-JD (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12., 2024), ECF No. 6. In the instant matter, Chiang brings a single cause of action for unlawful detainer.

The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore's Report and Recommendation to Remand to State Court, ECF 8, as well Defendant Sabrina Afifi's objections to the report. ECF 11. The Court finds the Report correct, well-reasoned and thorough, and adopts it in every respect.

Afifi objects to the Report and Recommendation, arguing that there is federal question jurisdiction because, as detailed in the notice of removal, Chiang allegedly discriminated against her in violation of her civil rights and the Fair Housing Act. ECF 11 at 14-18; see ECF 1 at 4-9. A defendant may not create federal question jurisdiction by adding claims or defenses to a notice of removal. See Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams, 482 U.S. 386, 393 (1987). Thus, Afifi's claims or defenses cannot form the basis of this Court's jurisdiction, see Provincal Gov't of Marinduque v. Placer Dome, Inc., 582 F.3d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir. 2009), and Afifi's objections fail to demonstrate that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation and remands the case to Alameda County Superior Court. The Clerk's Office is requested to close the case. No further filings will be accepted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Chiang v. Afifi

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 10, 2024
24-cv-01665-AMO (N.D. Cal. May. 10, 2024)
Case details for

Chiang v. Afifi

Case Details

Full title:TINA CHIANG, Plaintiff, v. SABRINA AFIFI, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 10, 2024

Citations

24-cv-01665-AMO (N.D. Cal. May. 10, 2024)