From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chi P&L Acupuncture, P.C. v. GEICO Gen. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 15, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 50768 (N.Y. App. Term 2022)

Opinion

No. 2019-954 K C

07-15-2022

Chi P&L Acupuncture, P.C., as Assignee of Oscar Fleming, Kedar Nashoba El, Sergio Mencia, Gabriel Santana, Carlos Viejo and Victor Pelaez, Jr., Respondent, v. GEICO General Ins. Co., Appellant.

Rivkin Radler, LLP (Stuart M. Bodoff of counsel), for appellant. Zara Javakov, P.C. (Zara Javakov of counsel), for respondent.


Unpublished Opinion

MOTION DECISION

Rivkin Radler, LLP (Stuart M. Bodoff of counsel), for appellant.

Zara Javakov, P.C. (Zara Javakov of counsel), for respondent.

PRESENT:: THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, P.J., WAVNY TOUSSAINT, DONNA-MARIE E. GOLIA, JJ

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Lorna J. McAllister, J.), entered January 23, 2019. The order, insofar as appealed from as limited by the brief, denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Civil Court as denied defendant's motion which had sought summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath (EUOs).

Contrary to defendant's contention, defendant's motion failed to establish that defendant had timely denied plaintiff's claims after plaintiff failed to appear at both an initial and a follow-up EUO (see Island Life Chiropractic Pain Care, PLLC v 21st Century Ins. Co., 74 Misc.3d 17 [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2021]; Quality Health Supply Corp. v Nationwide Ins., 69 Misc.3d 133 [A], 2020 NY Slip Op 51226[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2020]). As defendant did not demonstrate that it is not precluded from raising its proffered defense (see Westchester Med. Ctr. v Lincoln Gen. Ins. Co., 60 A.D.3d 1045 [2009]), defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly denied (see Quality Health Supply Corp. v Nationwide Ins., 2020 NY Slip Op 51226[U]). We reach no other issue.

Accordingly, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed.

ALIOTTA, P.J., TOUSSAINT and GOLIA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Chi P&L Acupuncture, P.C. v. GEICO Gen. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 15, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 50768 (N.Y. App. Term 2022)
Case details for

Chi P&L Acupuncture, P.C. v. GEICO Gen. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Chi P&L Acupuncture, P.C., as Assignee of Oscar Fleming, Kedar Nashoba El…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 15, 2022

Citations

2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 50768 (N.Y. App. Term 2022)