From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chestnut v. South Carolina Dept. of Corr

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 6, 2011
421 F. App'x 304 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-7748.

Submitted: March 31, 2011.

Decided: April 6, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (3:10-cv-02050-RMG).

Craig Latwain Chestnut, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Craig Latwain Chestnut appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Chestnut's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chestnut v. S.C. Dep't of Corr., No. 3:10-cv-02050-RMG (D.S.C. Oct. 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Chestnut v. South Carolina Dept. of Corr

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 6, 2011
421 F. App'x 304 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Chestnut v. South Carolina Dept. of Corr

Case Details

Full title:Craig Latwain CHESTNUT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Apr 6, 2011

Citations

421 F. App'x 304 (4th Cir. 2011)