Opinion
No. 2:11-cv-0989 MCE AC PS
03-05-2013
DANIEL K. CHESTANG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. YAHOO!, INC., Defendant.
ORDER
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this action on April 15, 2011 and was proceeding on a third amended complaint ("TAC") filed on September 25, 2012. On December 6, 2012, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations recommending that defendant's motion to dismiss the TAC be granted. That recommendation was adopted in full on February 14, 2013 by the Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr., and judgment was entered accordingly. Plaintiff has now filed a Notice of Appeal together with a motion for certificate of appealability. A motion for certificate of appealability, however, is unnecessary in the instant action because this is not a federal habeas corpus proceeding. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b).
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's March 1, 2013 motion for certificate of appealability is disregarded.
_________________________________
ALLISON CLAIRE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE