From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chestang v. Yahoo!, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 30, 2013
No. 2:11-cv-0989 MCE-AC-PS (E.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-0989 MCE-AC-PS

04-30-2013

DANIEL K. CHESTANG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. YAHOO!, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

The Court has received the referral notice, filed March 15, 2013, from the Court of Appeals, which remanded this case for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue on appeal, or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. (ECF No. 67.) The Court has reviewed the record and finds that the appeal is frivolous and is not taken in good faith. Revocation of Plaintiff's in forma status is therefore appropriate.

The Clerk of the Court shall serve the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit with a copy of this order (Appeal No. 13-15418).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Chestang v. Yahoo!, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 30, 2013
No. 2:11-cv-0989 MCE-AC-PS (E.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2013)
Case details for

Chestang v. Yahoo!, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL K. CHESTANG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. YAHOO!, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 30, 2013

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-0989 MCE-AC-PS (E.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2013)