From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cheris v. Washington

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 9, 2009
351 F. App'x 792 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-1586.

Submitted: October 29, 2009.

Decided: November 9, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01108-LMB-IDD).

Eddie Cheris, Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Stephen Nunzio, Jr., Assistant General Counsel, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Eddie Cheris appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment for the Appellee on Cheris' claims of negligence. The record does not contain a transcript of the April 24, 2009 hearing on the Appellee's motion for summary judgment. Cheris has not obtained a transcript or moved for a transcript at government expense. An appellant has the burden of including in the record on appeal a transcript of all parts of the proceedings material to the issues raised on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 10(b); 4th Cir. R. 10(c). An appellant proceeding on appeal in forma pauperis is entitled to transcripts at government expense only if the trial judge or a circuit judge certifies that the appeal is not frivolous but presents a substantial question. 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (2006). We have reviewed the record including the affidavits, motions, and exhibits and conclude that no error appears on the record before us and Cheris does not present a substantial question on appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 753(f). We therefore affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Cheris v. Washington

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 9, 2009
351 F. App'x 792 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Cheris v. Washington

Case Details

Full title:Eddie CHERIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Nov 9, 2009

Citations

351 F. App'x 792 (4th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Jarvis v. Enterprise Fleet Services

Plaintiff additionally requests, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 753(f), that the government be charged the cost of…