Cherfrere v. State

Full title: Morin CHERFRERE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Nov 24, 2021

329 So. 3d 259 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 3D19-2065

11-24-2021

Morin CHERFRERE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

McLain Law, P.A., and Matthew R. McLain (Longwood), for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

McLain Law, P.A., and Matthew R. McLain (Longwood), for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Hernandez v. State, 325 So.3d 82 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) ("The trial court's findings of fact on the statutory factors listed in [section 921.1402] are reviewed for the existence of competent, substantial evidence in the record."); Bell v. State, 313 So. 3d 1183, 1187 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021) ("On appeal, any factual findings by the trial court which are supported by competent, substantial evidence in the record must be affirmed, and the court's ultimate sentencing decision is reviewed for abuse of discretion." (citing Jackson v. State, 276 So. 3d 73, 76 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) )).