From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CHEN v. CHOW

United States District Court, N.D. California
Aug 26, 2003
Case No. C01-3669 EMC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2003)

Opinion

Case No. C01-3669 EMC

August 26, 2003

I Braun Degenshein, for Plaintiff; KEVIN CHEN, dba CHENERAL IMPORT EXPORT CO.

Robert Jacobs, for Defendants, BERTHA CHOW and MDS GEAR, INC.

Andrew I. Klimenko, COLOMBATTO, KLIMENKO ROSSE, for Defendant JUAN HUYNH

Robert Jacobs, Esq., BELASCO JACOBS TOWNSLEY LLP, Culver City, California, for Defendants, BERTHA CHOW and MDS GEAR, INC.


STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE


Pursuant to the settlement terms placed on the record on July 2, 2003 before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Courtroom E, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California, the parties, by and through their undersigned attorneys of record, hereby stipulate, if this Court so orders, that all causes of action, including all claims and counterclaims, in the above-entitled action be and hereby arc dismissed with prejudice.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all causes of action in the above-entitled matter are hereby dismissed with prejudice. attorneys of record, hereby stipulate, if this Court so orders, that all causes of action, including all claims and counterclaims, in the above-entitled action be and hereby are dismissed with prejudice.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all causes of action in the above-entitled matter are hereby dismissed with prejudice, attorneys of record, hereby stipulate, if this Court so orders, that all causes of action, including all claims and counterclaims, in the above-entitled action be and hereby are dismissed with prejudice.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all causes of action in the above-entitled matter are hereby dismissed with prejudice,

PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL

I am a resident of the county aforesaid; am over the age of 18 years and not party to the within action. My business address is 100 Corporate Pointe, Suite 330, Culver City, California 90230.

On August 20, 2003, I served the within document entitled

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

on the interested parties in the above action, by placing a true copy thereof, enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed as follows:

I. Braun Degenshein, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff 81 Skyway Lane KEVIN CHEN, dba CHENERAL Oakland, California 94619 IMPORT EXPORT CO. Telephone: (510)553-9669 Facsimile: (510)633-1900

Andrew M. Klimenko, Esq. Attorney for Defendant COLOMBATTO, KLIMENKO ROSSE JUAN HUYNH 130 Sutter Street, 7th Floor Telephone: (415)391-6182 San Francisco, California 94104 Facsimile: (415)391-2904

[X] BY MAIL: I am readily familiar with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. It is deposited with the United States Postal Service on the same day in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if the postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one (1) day after the date of deposit for mailing in the affidavit.
[X] FEDERAL I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made.


Summaries of

CHEN v. CHOW

United States District Court, N.D. California
Aug 26, 2003
Case No. C01-3669 EMC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2003)
Case details for

CHEN v. CHOW

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN CHEN, dba CHENERAL IMPORT EXPORT CO., Plaintiff, v. BERTHA CHOW; MDS…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Aug 26, 2003

Citations

Case No. C01-3669 EMC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2003)