From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chemical Bank v. Fazel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 4, 1997
245 A.D.2d 32 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

December 4, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.).


A party seeking vacatur of a default must establish both the existence of a meritorious claim or defense and a reasonable excuse for the default ( see, CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Eugene DiLorenzo, Inc. v. Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 N.Y.2d 138; Arias v. Sanchez, 227 A.D.2d 284). Defendant's justification for the default is that he did not receive a copy of plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, a claim that the court correctly found to be belied by the affidavit of service. Moreover, defendant failed to demonstrate that he possessed a meritorious defense to the action against him. His contention that plaintiff bank failed to sustain its burden of proving that the sale of the collateral was conducted in a commercially reasonable manner is raised for the first time on appeal.

We have reviewed defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rubin, Tom, Mazzarelli and Colabella, JJ.


Summaries of

Chemical Bank v. Fazel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 4, 1997
245 A.D.2d 32 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Chemical Bank v. Fazel

Case Details

Full title:CHEMICAL BANK, Respondent v. MEHDI FAZEL, Appellant, et al., Defendant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 4, 1997

Citations

245 A.D.2d 32 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
665 N.Y.S.2d 862