From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chemello v. Endlich

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 23, 1923
142 N.E. 321 (N.Y. 1923)

Opinion

Argued October 3, 1923

Decided October 23, 1923

Franklin Bien and Bennett E. Siegelstein for appellant.

Gustave A. Teitelbaum and Louis Jay for Emanuel Endlich et al., respondents.

Edward D. Bryde for Steneck Trust Company, respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., HOGAN, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ.


Summaries of

Chemello v. Endlich

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 23, 1923
142 N.E. 321 (N.Y. 1923)
Case details for

Chemello v. Endlich

Case Details

Full title:JUAN CHEMELLO, Appellant, v . EMANUEL ENDLICH et al., Respondents

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 23, 1923

Citations

142 N.E. 321 (N.Y. 1923)
142 N.E. 321

Citing Cases

Watkins Body Corporation v. Arditi Limited

Memorandum: Although the Erie County action is not yet at issue it clearly appears from the papers presented…

Sodus Fruit Farm v. Williams

In determining whether actions should be consolidated "the test is whether the particular actions can be…