From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chelette v. Riverwood Intn'l

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Oct 17, 2003
858 So. 2d 412 (La. 2003)

Opinion

No. 03-C-1483.

October 17, 2003.

IN RE: Riverwood International USA, Inc.; — Defendant; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review Office of Workers' Compensation, Dist-2, No. 00-03400; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 02-1347


Granted in part, otherwise denied. See per curiam.

JLW

PFC

CDK

JPV

CDT

JTK

JOHNSON, J. would deny the writ.


We granted certiorari in part to address one issue raised by the defendant, Riverwood International USA, Inc., in this workers' compensation case: whether the court of appeal erred in affirming an award of a penalty pursuant to LSA-R.S. 1201(F) when the employer had merely reduced supplemental earnings benefits (SEB) as contrasted with failing to make timely payment of benefits. In all other respects, the writ is denied.

The holding in Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La. 6/29/99), 737 So.2d 41, 45, clarified the differences between LSA-R.S. 23:1201 and LSA-R.S. 23:1201.2. In instances where the employer fails tocommence payment of benefits, penalties and attorney fees are authorized under LSA-R.S. 23:1201(F), unless the claim is reasonably controverted. However, when the case involves discontinuation of benefits rather than failure to provide benefits, LSA-R.S. 23:1201.2, not LSA-R.S. 23:1201(F), applies. Id .; see also, J.E. Merit Constructors, Inc. v. Hickman, 2000-0943, p. 5 n. 6 (La. 1/17/01), 776 So.2d 435, 437 n. 6. The sanction of penalties and attorney fees imposed by LSA-R.S. 23:1201 is not directed at the vocational rehabilitation obligation of LSA-R.S. 23:1226. See Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water District, 02-0439, p. 2, dissent, (La. 1/14/03), 836 So.2d 14, 29.

R.S. 23:1226(A) provides that when an employee has suffered a compensable injury which precludes him from earning wages "equal to wages earned" before this injury, he is entitled to "prompt rehabilitation services."

We limit our grant of this writ to correction of the penalty issue and do not reach the other issue.

Accordingly, we reverse the award of a penalty made in favor of claimant Gwendolyn Chelette, to conform with the law.

WRIT GRANTED IN PART TO REVERSE AWARD OF PENALTY; OTHERWISE DENIED.


Summaries of

Chelette v. Riverwood Intn'l

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Oct 17, 2003
858 So. 2d 412 (La. 2003)
Case details for

Chelette v. Riverwood Intn'l

Case Details

Full title:GWENDOLYN CHELETTE v. RIVERWOOD INTERNATIONAL USA, INC

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Oct 17, 2003

Citations

858 So. 2d 412 (La. 2003)

Citing Cases

Williams v. A-Jax Lumber

The applicable law at the time precluded an assessment of penalties for the failure to provide…

Hutchison v. Aldworth Company, Inc.

In the instant case, the employer discontinued benefits on May 2, 2002. The Supreme Court ruled in Chelette…