From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cheek v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 14, 2024
22-cv-06630-AMO (N.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2024)

Opinion

22-cv-06630-AMO 22-cv-6666-AMO

02-14-2024

SIDNEY CHEEK, Plaintiff, v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. SIDNEY CHEEK, Plaintiff, v. ADMIRAL VALVE, LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER RE CONSOLIDATION OF ACTIONS

RE: DKT. NO. 344

RE: DKT. NO. 60

ARACELI MARTÍNEZ-OLGUÍN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a), Plaintiff Sidney Cheek moved to consolidate the two Related Cases captioned above. No party filed an opposition to the administrative motion to consolidate. The Court finds that consolidation is appropriate under Rule 42(a) because the Related Cases involve common questions of law and fact; specifically, the cases name common defendants, arise from the same factual allegations, and otherwise include overlapping causes of action. Therefore, the Court GRANTS Cheek's motion to consolidate the two actions.

The case file for the Consolidated Action will be maintained under Case No. 22-cv-06630, and the Court adopts all pleadings, motions, appearances, and orders entered in both case numbers as if filed in the Consolidated Action. The Court finds no need to alter the case caption in Case No. 22-cv-06630.

The Court directs the clerk to administratively close Case No. 22-cv-6666.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cheek v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 14, 2024
22-cv-06630-AMO (N.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2024)
Case details for

Cheek v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:SIDNEY CHEEK, Plaintiff, v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 14, 2024

Citations

22-cv-06630-AMO (N.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2024)