From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cheatum v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jun 25, 2019
577 S.W.3d 509 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

WD 81101

06-25-2019

Domionte S. CHEATUM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Amanda Langenheim, Kansas City for appellant. Richard Starnes, Jefferson City for respondent.


Amanda Langenheim, Kansas City for appellant.

Richard Starnes, Jefferson City for respondent.

Before Division Two: Edward R. Ardini, Jr., P.J., and Alok Ahuja and Gary D. Witt, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Boone County, Domionte Cheatum was convicted of murder in the second degree, robbery in the first degree, and armed criminal action. The charges arose from an aborted drug deal and shooting which occurred in Columbia in June 2013. After we affirmed his convictions on direct appeal, Cheatum filed a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29.15. The circuit court denied Cheatum’s motion following an evidentiary hearing. Cheatum appeals. He argues that his trial and appellate counsel were ineffective for failing to adequately litigate a claim that the State had violated his constitutional right to a speedy trial. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided an unpublished memorandum to the parties which sets forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Cheatum v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jun 25, 2019
577 S.W.3d 509 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Cheatum v. State

Case Details

Full title:Domionte S. CHEATUM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Jun 25, 2019

Citations

577 S.W.3d 509 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)