From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chavez v. Errico

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 9, 1998
255 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 9, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O'Connell, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Parties attempting to vacate a default in appearing in an action and answering must establish both a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense ( see, Roussodimou v. Zafiriadis, 238 A.D.2d 568; Fennell v. Mason, 204 A.D.2d 599; Putney v. Pearlman, 203 A.D.2d 333). The defendants have failed to satisfy that standard in this case.

Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Chavez v. Errico

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 9, 1998
255 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Chavez v. Errico

Case Details

Full title:JULIO CHAVEZ, Respondent, v. JAMES J. ERRICO et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 9, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 843

Citing Cases

Warren v. Allstate Insurance Company

We modify. A defendant seeking to vacate a default must demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the default…

Neuman v. Greenblatt

Ordered that the order dated March 31, 1998, is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without…