From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chattman v. Polus

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Eastern Division
Jun 20, 2011
EDCV 08-1738 GAF (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2011)

Opinion


ANTHONY CHATTMAN, Petitioner, v. M. POLUS, WARDEN of CiM-CHINO, Respondent. No. EDCV 08-1738 GAF (FFM) United States District Court, C.D. California, Eastern Division. June 20, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          GARY A. FEESS, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written Objections to the Report. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the Petition on the merits with prejudice.


Summaries of

Chattman v. Polus

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Eastern Division
Jun 20, 2011
EDCV 08-1738 GAF (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Chattman v. Polus

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY CHATTMAN, Petitioner, v. M. POLUS, WARDEN of CiM-CHINO, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Eastern Division

Date published: Jun 20, 2011

Citations

EDCV 08-1738 GAF (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2011)