From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chasteen v. Mack

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Apr 18, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cv-37 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 18, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-cv-37

04-18-2013

ADAM CHASTEEN, Plaintiff, v. LAWRENCE MACK, et al., Defendants.


District Judge Thomas M. Rose

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


ORDER GRANTING PACER FEE EXEMPTION

This case is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Permit Exemption of PACER Case Access Fees (Doc. No. 19). Upon advice of the Public Access and Records Management Division of the Administrative Office of United States Courts that the request is within the purposes intended to be served by the exemption, and the Court's having previously found Plaintiff eligible to proceed in forma pauperis in this case, Plaintiff is hereby GRANTED an exemption from PACER access fees for the purpose of accessing the electronic files in this case only. The exemption shall apply from this date forward until final judgment is entered in the case or until further order of the Court.

Michael R. Merz

United States Magistrate Judge
Copies by email to Michel Ishakian and Ted Willman


Summaries of

Chasteen v. Mack

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Apr 18, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cv-37 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Chasteen v. Mack

Case Details

Full title:ADAM CHASTEEN, Plaintiff, v. LAWRENCE MACK, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Apr 18, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:13-cv-37 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 18, 2013)