From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chasteen v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 16, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-229 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 16, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cv-229

04-16-2013

ADAM CHASTEEN, Plaintiff, v. ROD JOHNSON, et al., Defendants.


Judge Marbley

Magistrate Judge King


ORDER

On March 27, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge recommended that plaintiff's motion to voluntarily dismiss the action be granted on the condition that, should plaintiff re-file the action, he be required to reimburse defendants for the expenses incurred by defendants in connection with the dismissal and re-filing of the action. Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 112. Although the parties were advised of their right to object to the recommendation and of the consequences of their failure to do so, there has been no objection.

The Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 112, is ADOPTED AND AFFIRMED. Plaintiff's motion to voluntarily dismiss the action, Doc. No. 106, is GRANTED on the condition that, should plaintiff re-file the action, he be required to reimburse defendants for the expenses incurred by defendants in connection with the dismissal and re-filing of the action.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter FINAL JUDGMENT in this action.

____________________

Algenon L. Marbley

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Chasteen v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 16, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-229 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Chasteen v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:ADAM CHASTEEN, Plaintiff, v. ROD JOHNSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 16, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-cv-229 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 16, 2013)

Citing Cases

Tyler v. Lavender

As explained below, the Court concludes that the expense and inconvenience associated with any future…