From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chartier v. Sherman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 24, 1996
672 So. 2d 604 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Summary

denying certiorari relief to tenant and upholding default under section 83.232 where tenant failed to abide by terms of stipulated agreement that rent be paid directly to landlord during pendency of litigation

Summary of this case from 214 Main Street Corp. v. Tanksley

Opinion

No. 96-463.

April 24, 1996.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Richard G. Payne, Judge.

Max P. Engel, Miami, and Laurie A. Beloff, North Miami, for petitioner.

Erol M. Vural, Summerland Key, for respondent.

Before BARKDULL, GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.


This case comes before this court on a petition for common law certiorari to review a decision of the circuit court acting in its appellate capacity. The underlying action involves a commercial lease. During the pendency of a suit for possession brought by Sherman, the landlord, he moved for payment of rent pursuant to § 83.232 Fla.Stat. (1993). Under the statute, rent is to be paid into the court registry during the pendency of the litigation. However, pursuant to a stipulation between the attorneys, the parties agreed that payments would be paid directly to the landlord. The tenant, Chartier, failed to abide by the terms of the stipulated agreement and, after notice, the trial court entered a default as permitted by § 83.232 (5). Subsequently, the trial court entered a writ of possession in favor of the landlord. The circuit court, in its appellate capacity, ultimately sustained the writ of possession. We find there was no departure from the essential requirements of the law and therefore, the petition for certiorari is denied.


Summaries of

Chartier v. Sherman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 24, 1996
672 So. 2d 604 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

denying certiorari relief to tenant and upholding default under section 83.232 where tenant failed to abide by terms of stipulated agreement that rent be paid directly to landlord during pendency of litigation

Summary of this case from 214 Main Street Corp. v. Tanksley
Case details for

Chartier v. Sherman

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND CHARTIER, PETITIONER, v. HAROLD J. SHERMAN, RESPONDENT

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 24, 1996

Citations

672 So. 2d 604 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

34th St. v. Pro-Karting Experience, Inc.

Although we do not reach this issue, we note that, even if it were properly before us, it would not…

214 Main Street Corp. v. Tanksley

Cases addressing this statute support the view that the Landlords here are entitled to a writ of possession.…