From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Charles v. GEICO Cas. Co.

United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana
Dec 13, 2022
6:22-CV-01747 (W.D. La. Dec. 13, 2022)

Opinion

6:22-CV-01747

12-13-2022

CORDERALL J CHARLES v. GEICO CASUALTY CO


CAROL B. WHITEHURST MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JUDGMENT

ROBERT R. SUMMERHAYS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Carol B. Whitehurst for report and recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and noting the absence of any objections, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, consistent with the report and recommendation, GEICO Casualty Company's Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue and for Failure to State a Claim (erroneously styled as a Motion to Show Cause on GEICO's Exceptions of Improper Venue, Prescription, No; Cause/Right of Action, and Vagueness/Ambiguity) (Rec. Doc. 5) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Motion is granted to the extent GEICO seeks to dismiss Plaintiff's claims for failure to state claims for bad faith under La. R.S. 22:1973 and 1892. The Motion is denied in all other respects. Accordingly, 1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff s claims are dismissed with prejudice. 2


Summaries of

Charles v. GEICO Cas. Co.

United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana
Dec 13, 2022
6:22-CV-01747 (W.D. La. Dec. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Charles v. GEICO Cas. Co.

Case Details

Full title:CORDERALL J CHARLES v. GEICO CASUALTY CO

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana

Date published: Dec 13, 2022

Citations

6:22-CV-01747 (W.D. La. Dec. 13, 2022)