From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Charles H. v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Aug 14, 2018
CIVIL NO. 2:17-CV-273-DBH (D. Me. Aug. 14, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 2:17-CV-273-DBH

08-14-2018

CHARLES H., PLAINTIFF v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, DEFENDANT


ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On July 20, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, his Report and Recommended Decision. The time within which to file objections expired on August 3, 2018, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The Commissioner's decision is VACATED and the case REMANDED for proceedings consistent herewith.

SO ORDERED.

DATED THIS 14TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2018

/S/D. BROCK HORNBY

D. BROCK HORNBY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Charles H. v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Aug 14, 2018
CIVIL NO. 2:17-CV-273-DBH (D. Me. Aug. 14, 2018)
Case details for

Charles H. v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES H., PLAINTIFF v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Aug 14, 2018

Citations

CIVIL NO. 2:17-CV-273-DBH (D. Me. Aug. 14, 2018)

Citing Cases

Lagorio v. Saul

Here, however, the only relevant step is the first step, at which the claimant has the burden to establish…