From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chard v. Stone

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1857
7 Cal. 117 (Cal. 1857)

Opinion

         Appeal from the District Court of the Ninth Judicial District, County of Shasta.

         The plaintiffs filed their bill for an injunction restraining the defendant from running a ferry within a mile of plaintiff's ferry. The facts are the same, as well as the parties, referred to in preceding case of Chard et al. v. Harrison.

         The Court granted a preliminary injunction, which it afterwards, on the hearing of the case, dissolved.

         Plaintiffs appealed.

         COUNSEL:

         Edwards & English, for Appellant.

          Garter & Earl, and J. O. Goodwin, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: Murray, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Burnett, J., concurring.

         OPINION

          MURRAY, Judge

         This appeal is prosecuted from an order of the Court below refusing to issue a commission to take testimony, and from an order refusing to change the place of trial.

         Neither of them are appealable orders under the statute as it now stands, although they may be reviewed on an appeal from the final judgment in the case.

         Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Chard v. Stone

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1857
7 Cal. 117 (Cal. 1857)
Case details for

Chard v. Stone

Case Details

Full title:CHARD et al. v. STONE

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jan 1, 1857

Citations

7 Cal. 117 (Cal. 1857)

Citing Cases

Gilman v. County of Contra Costa

(Pr. Act, Sec. 336, sub 3; Baker v. Rosenthal , 7 Cal. June 7, 1857; Henley v. Hastings , 3Cal. 341; People…

Vallejo Ferry Company v. Lang

1893, p. 288) is or is not applicable to the disposition of a ferry franchise in the city of Vallejo, or that…