From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chapman v. U.S. EEOC

United States District Court, N.D. California
Sep 6, 2007
No. C 07-01527 SBA (N.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2007)

Opinion

No. C 07-01527 SBA.

September 6, 2007


ORDER


On July 2, 2007, Defendant The San Francisco Chronicle filed a Motion to Dismiss, or, in the alternative for More Definite Statement, and noticed the motion for September 11, 2007. See Docket No. 14. On July 26, 2007, Defendant Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") filed a Motion to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted against EEOC under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), and failure to effect proper service upon EEOC under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). See Docket No. 18. This Motion was also noticed for September 11, 2007.

Under Local Rule 7-3(a), Plaintiff's oppositions were due on August 21, 2007. Plaintiff has not filed any opposition or otherwise responded to either of defendants' Motions to Dismiss. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT defendants' Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Chapman v. U.S. EEOC

United States District Court, N.D. California
Sep 6, 2007
No. C 07-01527 SBA (N.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2007)
Case details for

Chapman v. U.S. EEOC

Case Details

Full title:Gregory Chapman, Sr., Plaintiff, v. U.S. EEOC, San Francisco Newspaper…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Sep 6, 2007

Citations

No. C 07-01527 SBA (N.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2007)