From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chapman v. Thacker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Sep 11, 2012
CASE NO. 3:11-00006 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 11, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:11-00006

09-11-2012

CHRIS CHAPMAN, Plaintiff, v. ROYCE THACKER, et al., Defendants.


Chief Judge Haynes


ORDER

Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 142) that the motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 98) filed by Defendant Southern Health Partners, Inc., be granted and that this Defendant be dismissed from this action with prejudice. The Plaintiff objects to the Report and Recommendation and filed an appeal of the Report and Recommendation. (Docket Entry No. 146). Plaintiffs principal objection is the alleged lack of discovery that the Magistrate Judge and this Court has held to be without merit.

After de novo review, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. (Docket Entry No. 142). The Defendant Southern Health Partners, Inc., motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 98) is GRANTED and Plaintiffs claims against Defendant Southern Heath Partners, Inc. are DISMISSED with prejudice,

It is so ORDERED.

______________________

WILLIAM J. HAYNES, JR.

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Chapman v. Thacker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Sep 11, 2012
CASE NO. 3:11-00006 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Chapman v. Thacker

Case Details

Full title:CHRIS CHAPMAN, Plaintiff, v. ROYCE THACKER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Sep 11, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 3:11-00006 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 11, 2012)