From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chapman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jan 22, 2002
66 S.W.3d 174 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. ED 79915.

January 22, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Francois County, Honorable Kenneth W. Pratte.

Amy M. Bartholow, Asst. Public Defender, 3402 Buttonwood Drive, Columbia, MO, 65201, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stephanie Morrell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Appeal Box 899, Jefferson City, MO, 65102, for Respondent.

Before William H. Crandall, Jr., P.J., and Kathianne Knaup Crane and Robert G. Dowd, Jr., JJ.



ORDER


Appellant, Phillip Chapman, appeals the judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. He claims the sentencing court unconstitutionally punished him for crimes for which he had not been convicted.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Chapman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jan 22, 2002
66 S.W.3d 174 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Chapman v. State

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIP CHAPMAN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Jan 22, 2002

Citations

66 S.W.3d 174 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)