Chapman v. State

Full title: MICHAEL LEE CHAPMAN, II, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court: Florida Court of Appeals, Second District

Date published: Jun 24, 2022

No. 2D21-458 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jun. 24, 2022)

Opinion

2D21-458

06-24-2022

MICHAEL LEE CHAPMAN, II, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Joanna Beth Conner, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James A. Hellickson, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Bruce E. Kyle, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Joanna Beth Conner, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James A. Hellickson, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed. See Pair v. State, 113 So.3d 843 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (dismissing an appeal from a probation revocation order because the appellant had completed the resulting sentence and therefore the court could no longer provide any meaningful relief); Raines v. State, 14 So.3d 244, 246 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ("[A]s a 1 general rule, a sentence cannot be challenged after it has been fully served and has expired because any sentencing issue is moot thereafter.").

NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur. 2