From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chapman v. Mueller Water Prods., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 12, 2020
19 CIVIL 3260 LJL) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 12, 2020)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 3260 LJL)

06-12-2020

GLEN CHAPMAN, ANDREA PETERSON, and KEVIN KELLY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS, INC., GREGORY E. HYLAND, J. SCOTT HALL, EVAN L. HART, and MARIETTA EDMUND ZAKAS, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated June 11, 2020, Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted with prejudice; Plaintiffs made no request for leave to amend in the SAC or the Opposition, and Plaintiffs did not make such an application at oral argument even when Defendants raised the issue. The dismissal is thus with prejudice; accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

June 12, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Chapman v. Mueller Water Prods., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 12, 2020
19 CIVIL 3260 LJL) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 12, 2020)
Case details for

Chapman v. Mueller Water Prods., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GLEN CHAPMAN, ANDREA PETERSON, and KEVIN KELLY, individually and on behalf…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jun 12, 2020

Citations

19 CIVIL 3260 LJL) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 12, 2020)