From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chapman v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 26, 2013
3:09-cv-228-RCJ-VPC (D. Nev. Nov. 26, 2013)

Opinion

3:09-cv-228-RCJ-VPC

11-26-2013

GEORGE P. CHAPMAN, JR.; BRENDA J. GULLY CHAPMAN, Plaintiffs, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee, a German nationa corporation; NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING CORPORATION, an Arizona corporation; HOMEQ SERVICING CORPORATION, a California corporation, Defendants.


ORDER

This case is currently on remand from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. In its memorandum disposition, the Ninth Circuit vacated this Court's order "dismissing Plaintiffs-Appellants' complaint for failure to state a claim, because the court lacked jurisdiction to enter it." (Mem. Dispo. (#23) at 3). The Ninth Circuit remanded the case back to this Court "to determine whether or not parallel state proceedings remain pending." (Id. at 3-4). The Ninth Circuit held that "[i]f the Unlawful Detainer Action remains pending, the Quiet Title Action should be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction over the res . . . If the state action has terminated, the district court may elect to proceed with the instant action." (Id. at 4).

Pursuant to the Ninth Circuit's remand, this Court now orders the parties to provide this Court with an update regarding the status of the unlawful detainer action in state court. If the unlawful detainer action is still pending in state court, the parties shall file a motion with this Court to dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction over the res. If the unlawful detainer action is no longer pending in state court, the parties shall file a motion with this Court to proceed with the instant action. The parties shall file the appropriate motion within 20 days of the entry of this order.

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall provide this Court with an update regarding the status of the unlawful detainer action in state court. The parties have 20 days from the date of this order to file the appropriate motion with this Court based on the status of the unlawful detainer action as detailed above.

_________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Chapman v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 26, 2013
3:09-cv-228-RCJ-VPC (D. Nev. Nov. 26, 2013)
Case details for

Chapman v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co.

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE P. CHAPMAN, JR.; BRENDA J. GULLY CHAPMAN, Plaintiffs, v. DEUTSCHE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 26, 2013

Citations

3:09-cv-228-RCJ-VPC (D. Nev. Nov. 26, 2013)