From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chapman, v. Commercial National Bank of Cedartown

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jan 16, 1952
208 Ga. 593 (Ga. 1952)

Opinion

17659.

ARGUED NOVEMBER 13, 1951.

DECIDED JANUARY 16, 1952.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Olin T. Flournoy, presiding Polk Superior Court. August 30, 1951.

Maddox Maddox, for plaintiff.

Stewart York and Henry A. Stewart, for defendants.


1. No decision or judgment in a case which is pending in the court below is deemed to be a final judgment unless it is, or would have been if rendered as claimed, a final disposition of the cause or final as to some material party thereto. Code (Ann. Supp.), § 6-701 (Ga. L. 1890-1, p. 82; 1946, pp. 726, 730); Mechanics' Traders' Bank of Rome v. Harrison, 68 Ga. 463; Irby v. Irby, 167 Ga. 708, 710 ( 146 S.E. 489); Ryals v. Atlantic Life Ins. Co., 181 Ga. 843 ( 184 S.E. 698).

2. The decision complained of here, if it had been rendered as claimed by the plaintiff in error, would have been a final judgment terminating the case, and the bill of exceptions can not be dismissed as being premature, as in Ryals v. Atlantic Life Ins. Co., supra, and Ryles v. Moore, 191 Ga. 661 ( 13 S.E.2d 672).

3. No answer having been filed by the defendant bank within the statutory time, and the time for filing not having been extended or the default opened as a matter of right within 15 days thereafter — the suit not being for unliquidated damages — the case was automatically in default, under Code (Ann. Supp.) § 110-401 (Ga. L. 1799, Cobb 486; 1895, p. 45; 1946, pp. 761, 777), and the court erred in overruling the oral motion of the petitioner to enter judgment in her favor when the case was duly called for trial, thereby rendering nugatory all further proceedings in the case.

Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur.

No. 17659. ARGUED NOVEMBER 13, 1951 — DECIDED JANUARY 16, 1952.


Summaries of

Chapman, v. Commercial National Bank of Cedartown

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jan 16, 1952
208 Ga. 593 (Ga. 1952)
Case details for

Chapman, v. Commercial National Bank of Cedartown

Case Details

Full title:CHAPMAN, administratrix, v. COMMERCIAL NATIONAL BANK OF CEDARTOWN et al

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Jan 16, 1952

Citations

208 Ga. 593 (Ga. 1952)
68 S.E.2d 603

Citing Cases

Hartsfield Company No. 3, Inc. v. Williams

As was stated in Head v. Marietta Guano Co., 124 Ga. 983 (2) ( 53 S.E. 676) "[d]irect exception may be taken…

Commercial National Bank of Cedartown v. Chapman

No answer having been filed by the defendant bank within the statutory time, counsel for the plaintiff made…