From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chapman v. Commerce Bank of St. Louis

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
Jan 20, 1998
959 S.W.2d 934 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 72277.

ORDER FILED: January 20, 1998.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HON. KENNETH M. ROMINES.

Alan J. Agathen, 130 S. Bemiston, Suite 610, St. Louis, MO 63105, for appellant.

Brad D. Pierce, KRAMER FRANK, 9666 Olive Blvd., #450, St. Louis, MO 63132, for respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Paul J. Simon and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.



ORDER


F.A. Chapman Carol Chapman (Chapmans) appeal from the denial of their motion to contest jurisdiction and set aside revival of judgment against them. On appeal, Chapmans contend that the trial court erred in denying their motion to set aside the revival of judgment against them because the revival was void in that the trial court, in 1991, had lacked jurisdiction to enter the order on the motion of St. Louis County Bank for the reason that St. Louis County Bank was a nonexistent legal entity at the time.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Chapman v. Commerce Bank of St. Louis

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
Jan 20, 1998
959 S.W.2d 934 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Chapman v. Commerce Bank of St. Louis

Case Details

Full title:F.A. CHAPMAN CAROL CHAPMAN, Defendant/Appellant v. COMMERCE BANK OF ST…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR

Date published: Jan 20, 1998

Citations

959 S.W.2d 934 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)