From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chapa v. Bayles Props., Inc.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jan 22, 2020
179 A.D.3d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

2017–12625 Index No. 606717/14

01-22-2020

Andres Javier Lazo CHAPA, Respondent, v. BAYLES PROPERTIES, INC., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP, Hawthorne, N.Y. (Timothy G. McNamara of counsel), for appellants. Ginarte Gallardo Gonzalez & Winograd, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Timothy Norton of counsel), for respondent.


Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP, Hawthorne, N.Y. (Timothy G. McNamara of counsel), for appellants.

Ginarte Gallardo Gonzalez & Winograd, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Timothy Norton of counsel), for respondent.

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., REINALDO E. RIVERA, RUTH C. BALKIN, JOSEPH J. MALTESE, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Bayles Properties, Inc., Ressa Real Estate, Ressa Family, LLC, Ressa Properties, LLC, Ressa Building, LLC, Ressa GTZ Properties, LLC, and Ressa Management, LLC, appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Anthony L. Parga, J.), entered September 20, 2017. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240(1) by the defendant Bayles Properties, Inc.

ORDERED that the appeal by the defendants Ressa Real Estate, Ressa Family, LLC, Ressa Properties, LLC, Ressa Building, LLC, Ressa GTZ Properties, LLC, and Ressa Management, LLC, is dismissed, as those defendants are not aggrieved by the portion of the order appealed from (see CPLR 5511 ; Mixon v. TBV, Inc., 76 A.D.3d 144, 156–157, 904 N.Y.S.2d 132 ); and it is further,

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the defendant Bayles Properties, Inc.; and it is further,

ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff.

The plaintiff, a painter employed by nonparty Super Plaster, LLC, allegedly was injured when the extension ladder on which he was standing slid and fell, causing him to fall. The plaintiff commenced this personal injury action against, among others, the defendant Bayles Properties, Inc. (hereinafter Bayles), the owner of the premises where the accident occurred, alleging, inter alia, that Bayles violated Labor Law § 240(1). The plaintiff moved, inter alia, for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240(1) by Bayles. In an order entered September 20, 2017, the Supreme Court granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion, and this appeal ensued.

We agree with the Supreme Court's determination granting that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the Labor Law § 240(1) cause of action asserted against Bayles. The plaintiff established, prima facie, Bayles's liability under Labor Law § 240(1) through the submission of a transcript of the plaintiff's deposition testimony, which demonstrated that he was provided with a ladder that lacked rubber feet, and that the ladder, which was leaning against a wall, slid away from the wall, causing the plaintiff to fall to the ground (see Fox v. H & M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P., 83 A.D.3d 889, 922 N.Y.S.2d 139 ; Barr v. 157 5 Ave., LLC, 60 A.D.3d 796, 797, 875 N.Y.S.2d 228 ; Jicheng Liu v. Sanford Tower Condominium, Inc., 35 A.D.3d 378, 828 N.Y.S.2d 101 ; Boe v. Gammarati, 26 A.D.3d 351, 809 N.Y.S.2d 550 ). In opposition, Bayles failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff's conduct was the sole proximate cause of the accident (see Ortiz v. Burke Ave. Realty, Inc., 126 A.D.3d 577, 3 N.Y.S.3d 582 ; Triola v. City of New York, 62 A.D.3d 984, 986, 880 N.Y.S.2d 126 ; Orphanoudakis v. Dormitory Auth. of State of N.Y., 40 A.D.3d 502, 837 N.Y.S.2d 61 ).

Bayles's contention that the plaintiff's motion was premature is without merit (see Northfield Ins. Co. v. Golob, 164 A.D.3d 682, 683–684, 81 N.Y.S.3d 192 ; Reynolds v. Avon Grove Props., 129 A.D.3d 932, 933, 12 N.Y.S.3d 199 ).

MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, BALKIN and MALTESE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Chapa v. Bayles Props., Inc.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jan 22, 2020
179 A.D.3d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Chapa v. Bayles Props., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Andres Javier Lazo Chapa, respondent, v. Bayles Properties, Inc., et al.…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Jan 22, 2020

Citations

179 A.D.3d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
114 N.Y.S.3d 717
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 397

Citing Cases

Chapa v. Bayles Props.

The plaintiff moved, inter alia, for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action…