From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chang v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Oct 6, 2022
No. 21-10652 (5th Cir. Oct. 6, 2022)

Opinion

21-10652

10-06-2022

Wayne Joseph Chang, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellee.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:21-CV-776

Before WIENER, ELROD, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

Wayne Joseph Chang, federal prisoner # 57957-177, appeals the magistrate judge's order, as well as the order denying his subsequent motion for reconsideration thereof, directing him to pay the filing fee for his civil action and deferring a decision on his motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

As the record does not reflect that the parties consented to proceed before the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the orders in question were not appealable to this court, and we are without jurisdiction to review them. See Donaldson v. Ducote, 373 F.3d 622, 624-25 (5th Cir. 2004); Butler v. S. Porter, 999 F.3d 287, 297 (5th Cir. 2021), cert. denied, 142 S.Ct. 766 (2022). We are also unable to view Chang's notice of appeal as effective to appeal the subsequent order and judgment of the district court. See United States v. Cooper, 135 F.3d 960, 963 (5th Cir. 1998).

The appeal is accordingly DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Pursuant to 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 47.5.4.


Summaries of

Chang v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Oct 6, 2022
No. 21-10652 (5th Cir. Oct. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Chang v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Wayne Joseph Chang, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. United States of America…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Oct 6, 2022

Citations

No. 21-10652 (5th Cir. Oct. 6, 2022)

Citing Cases

Wayne Joseph Chang v. United States

His attorney filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and the United States Court…