Chanel, Inc. v. Unincorporated Ass'n

Full title: Chanel, Inc. v. The Unincorporated Association et al

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 30, 2011

Case No. CV 11-03780-GAF (PJWx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV 11-03780-GAF (PJWx)

09-30-2011

Chanel, Inc. v. The Unincorporated Association et al

GARY ALLEN FEESS

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Present: The Honorable GARY ALLEN FEESS

+-----------------------------------------------+ ¦Renee Fisher¦None ¦N/A ¦ +------------+-------------------------+--------¦ ¦Deputy Clerk¦Court Reporter / Recorder¦Tape No.¦ +-----------------------------------------------+

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: None

Attorneys Present for Defendants: None

Proceedings: (In Chambers)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). In this matter:

[×] Defendant(s) did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint.

Plaintiffs must respond to this order within 20 days. Failure to respond to this OSC will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.