Chancey v. State

Full title: Curtis Eugene CHANCEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Aug 10, 2012

94 So. 3d 666 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 5D12–1960.

2012-08-10

Curtis Eugene CHANCEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Sandra Edwards–Stephens, Judge. Curtis E. Chancey, Ocala, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori N. Hagan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Sandra Edwards–Stephens, Judge.
Curtis E. Chancey, Ocala, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori N. Hagan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

The State properly concedes that reversal of the trial court's summary denial of Chancey's Rule 3.850 motion is required because of the failure of the trial court to attach the necessary portions of the record to support denial. On remand, the trial court must either attach those portions of the record conclusively refuting Chancey's claim, or hold an evidentiary hearing.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

EVANDER, COHEN and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.