Chan v. Brother International Corporation

Full title: HARK CHAN, a California resident, and IP INNOVATION, L.L.C., a Texas…

Court: United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Jul 26, 2004

Case No. C 03-2694 VRW (N.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2004)

Opinion

Case No. C 03-2694 VRW.

July 26, 2004

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, III, GAIL G. QUAN, COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY BASS, LLP, San Francisco, CA.

RONALD J. SCHUTZ (Admitted Pro Hac Vice), EMMETT J. McMAHON (Admitted Pro Hac Vice), BRIAN W. OBERST (Admitted Pro Hac Vice), ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER CIRESI L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN, Attorneys for Plaintiffs HARK CHAN AND IP INNOVATION, L.L.C.

THERESA K. HANKES, DORSEY WHITNEY LLP, San Francisco, CA.

JOHN E. DANIEL, VITO J. DeBARI, KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS FRANKEL LLP, New York, NY, Attorneys for Defendant CANON U.S.A., INC.

BARRY D. REIN, SCOTT D. STIMPSON, PETER SCHUYLER, MORGAN, LEWIS BOCKIUS LLP, New York, NY.

ANDREW J. WU, MORGAN, LEWIS BOCKIUS LLP, Palo Alto, CA, Attorneys for Defendant CASIO, INC.

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION

VAUGHN WALKER, District JudgePage 2

Pursuant to Stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Plaintiffs Hark Chan and IP Innovation, LLC (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Casio, Inc. ("Casio") hereby voluntarily dismiss, with prejudice, all claims brought by and against each other in this civil action; and

2. Each settling party, Plaintiffs and Casio, shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees.

SO ORDERED.