From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Champion Spark Plug Co. v. Gyromat Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 6, 1981
636 F.2d 907 (2d Cir. 1981)

Opinion

No. 211, Docket 80-7516.

Argued December 1, 1980.

Decided January 6, 1981.

Mark C. Schaffer, Emch, Schaffer, Schaub Todd Co., L.P.A., Toledo, Ohio (John C. Vassil, Morgan, Finnegan, Pine, Foley Lee, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Fritz L. Schweitzer, Jr., New York City (Michael A. Cornman, Mandeville Schweitzer, New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut.

Before OAKES and MESKILL, Circuit Judges, and WERKER, District Judge.

Of the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.


We affirm on the memorandum opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, Warren W. Eginton, Judge, 88 F.R.D. 526 (D.Conn. 1980), declining to grant under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59 or 60(b)(2) a motion to reopen the trial proceedings on the basis of newly discovered evidence, filed following remand after Champion Spark Plug Co. v. Gyromat Corp., 603 F.2d 361 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 916, 100 S.Ct. 1276, 63 L.Ed.2d 600 (1980).

Appellee's request for double costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1912 and Fed.R.App.P. 38 is denied.


Summaries of

Champion Spark Plug Co. v. Gyromat Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 6, 1981
636 F.2d 907 (2d Cir. 1981)
Case details for

Champion Spark Plug Co. v. Gyromat Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CHAMPION SPARK PLUG COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. THE GYROMAT CORPORATION…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Jan 6, 1981

Citations

636 F.2d 907 (2d Cir. 1981)

Citing Cases

In re Wyatt, Inc.

the [evidence] (1) is in fact newly discovered, i.e., discovered since the trial; (2) could not with due…

In re Bahre

Under those circumstances, the moving party must also show due diligence. See Champion Spark Plug Co. v.…