From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chambers v. Dist. of Columbia

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Jun 23, 2022
No. 19-7098 (D.C. Cir. Jun. 23, 2022)

Opinion

19-7098

06-23-2022

MARY E. CHAMBERS, APPELLANT v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, APPELLEE


Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:14-cv-02032) On Remand from the En Banc Court

Before: TATEL [*] , Circuit Judge, and GINSBURG, Senior Circuit Judge.

JUDGMENT

This matter came to be heard on remand following rehearing en banc by the court. In accordance with opinion of the court in Chambers v. District of Columbia, No. 19-7098 (D.C. Jun 3, 2022) (en banc), overruling Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446 (D.C. Cir. 1999), it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the District Court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the District of Columbia on the retaliation claim be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the panel's opinion issued February 19, 2021. It is

FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the District Court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the District of Columbia on the discrimination claim be reversed and the case be remanded to the District Court for further proceedings consistent with the court's June 3, 2022 en banc opinion in Chambers.

The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.


Summaries of

Chambers v. Dist. of Columbia

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Jun 23, 2022
No. 19-7098 (D.C. Cir. Jun. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Chambers v. Dist. of Columbia

Case Details

Full title:MARY E. CHAMBERS, APPELLANT v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, APPELLEE

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Jun 23, 2022

Citations

No. 19-7098 (D.C. Cir. Jun. 23, 2022)

Citing Cases

Wright v. Garland

As relevant here, “only a retaliatory act that is ‘materially adverse' to the plaintiff is actionable.”…

Seed v. Regan

ECF No. 33, Defs. Suppl. Br. at 12. And since the EPA filed its brief, the D. C. Circuit held in Chambers v.…