Opinion
No. 29041
Decided April 1, 1942.
Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Statute of limitations — Section 11222, General Code — Oral contract with bond dealer to invest funds on percentage of profits — Action to recover alleged excess profits — Appeal on law and fact — Commissioner appointed to take testimony — Failure of Court of Appeals to rule on admissibility of evidence — Section 16, Article I, Constitution — Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.
Messrs. Cull Fuller and Mr. James Easly, for appellant.
Messrs. Miller Hornbeck, for appellee.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., TURNER, WILLIAMS, MATTHIAS, HART and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.
BETTMAN, J., not participating.