From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chajchic v. Rowley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 3, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-457 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 3, 2017)

Summary

providing that "aliens who receive a bond hearing before the immigration judge" are required to "exhaust their administrative remedies and raise any issues with the BIA prior to seeking federal habeas corpus relief"

Summary of this case from Pratt v. Doll

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-457

10-03-2017

GERMAN CHAJCHIC, Petitioner v. JOHN ROWLEY, et al., Respondents


( ) ORDER

AND NOW, this 3rd day of October, 2017, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 16) of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson, recommending that the court deny the motion (Doc. 8) by petitioner German Chajchic ("Chajchic") requesting that the court reopen the above-captioned matter and either (1) order his immediate release from detention or (2) conduct an individualized bond hearing, (see id.), and the court noting that Chajchic filed objections (Doc. 17) to the report, see FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2), and respondents filed a brief (Doc. 18) in opposition thereto, and, following a de novo review of the contested portions of the report, see Behar v. Pa. Dep't of Transp., 791 F. Supp. 2d 383, 389 (M.D. Pa. 2011) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Sample v. Diecks, 885 F.2d 1099, 1106 n.3 (3d Cir. 1989)), and applying a clear error standard of review to the uncontested portions, see Cruz v. Chater, 990 F. Supp. 375, 376-78 (M.D. Pa. 1999), the court being in full agreement with Judge Carlson's analysis, and finding same to be thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported by the record, and finding Chajchic's objections (Doc.17) to be without merit and squarely addressed by the report, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The report (Doc. 16) of Magistrate Judge Carlson is ADOPTED.

2. Chajchic's motion (Doc. 8) to reopen the above-captioned matter is DENIED.

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Chajchic v. Rowley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 3, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-457 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 3, 2017)

providing that "aliens who receive a bond hearing before the immigration judge" are required to "exhaust their administrative remedies and raise any issues with the BIA prior to seeking federal habeas corpus relief"

Summary of this case from Pratt v. Doll

providing that "aliens who receive a bond hearing before the immigration judge" are required to "exhaust their administrative remedies and raise any issues with the BIA prior to seeking federal habeas corpus relief"

Summary of this case from Anwari v. Lowe

providing that "aliens who receive a bond hearing before the immigration judge" are required to "exhaust their administrative remedies and raise any issues with the BIA prior to seeking federal habeas corpus relief"

Summary of this case from Kamara v. Doll
Case details for

Chajchic v. Rowley

Case Details

Full title:GERMAN CHAJCHIC, Petitioner v. JOHN ROWLEY, et al., Respondents

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Oct 3, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-457 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 3, 2017)

Citing Cases

Kamara v. Doll

Second, the petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. The court provided that it could not…

Pratt v. Doll

Second, the court found that petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. The court stated that…