From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chaffraix v. Shiff

U.S.
Jan 1, 1875
92 U.S. 214 (1875)

Opinion

OCTOBER TERM, 1875.

The doctrine announced in the case of Wallach et al. v. Van Riswick, supra, p. 202, reaffirmed.

Mr. Conway Robinson for the appellant, and Mr. John A. Campbell for the appellee.


APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Louisiana.


The court below decreed specific performance of a contract for the purchase of real estate, which expressly stipulated that the purchaser should not be bound to accept the sale if the titles were not good and valid. The title offered was that of a purchaser at a confiscation sale, to whom, after the sale, Surget, the person as whose property the land was confiscated, had released, without warranty. We decided, in Wallach et al. v. Van Riswick, supra, p. 202, that such a title is not a complete and valid one; that it is ineffective beyond the life of Surget; and that his release did not enlarge it.

Decree reversed.


Summaries of

Chaffraix v. Shiff

U.S.
Jan 1, 1875
92 U.S. 214 (1875)
Case details for

Chaffraix v. Shiff

Case Details

Full title:CHAFFRAIX v . SHIFF

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 1, 1875

Citations

92 U.S. 214 (1875)

Citing Cases

Ill. Central Railroad v. Bosworth

Mr. Edgar H. Farrar (with whom was Mr. Ernest B Kruttschnitt on the brief) for defendants in error. The whole…