From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chae v. Topps Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 15, 2011
Case No. CV 11-4168 PA (MANx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV 11-4168 PA (MANx)

11-15-2011

Heedong Chae v. The Topps Company, Inc.


CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

+------------------------------------+ ¦Paul Songco ¦Not Reported ¦N/A ¦ +------------+--------------+--------¦ ¦Deputy Clerk¦Court Reporter¦Tape No.¦ +------------------------------------+

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Proceedings: Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal For Lack Of Prosecution

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 120 days after the complaint is filed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).

In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before November 29, 2011, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response. Failure to respond to this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal of the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____ : ____

Initials of Preparer ____


Summaries of

Chae v. Topps Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 15, 2011
Case No. CV 11-4168 PA (MANx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Chae v. Topps Co.

Case Details

Full title:Heedong Chae v. The Topps Company, Inc.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 15, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV 11-4168 PA (MANx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2011)