From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chadbourne v. Longstaff

United States District Court, D. Maine
Sep 10, 2021
2:21-cv-00085-NT (D. Me. Sep. 10, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00085-NT

09-10-2021

HERB CHADBOURNE, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN LONGSTAFF, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NANCY TORRESEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On July 31, 2021, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 11). The time within which to file objections has expired, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Chadbourne v. Longstaff

United States District Court, D. Maine
Sep 10, 2021
2:21-cv-00085-NT (D. Me. Sep. 10, 2021)
Case details for

Chadbourne v. Longstaff

Case Details

Full title:HERB CHADBOURNE, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN LONGSTAFF, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, D. Maine

Date published: Sep 10, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-00085-NT (D. Me. Sep. 10, 2021)