Opinion
Civil Action 3:22-CV-1802-S-BH
12-06-2023
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. See ECF No. 39. Objections were filed. The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. To the extent that it seeks post-judgment relief, Plaintiffs [sic] Writ of Mandamus Under Codes U.S 2513-Unjust Conviction, U.S. Code 1983 Civil Deprivation of Rights, Due Process Civil Rights Act 1964, Unjust Conclusions of This Court and Magistrate [ECF No. 38], is liberally construed as a motion to alter or amend the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) and DENIED.
SO ORDERED.