From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
May 13, 2002
535 U.S. 1067 (2002)

Opinion

MAY 13, 2002.


No. 01-9401 HINTON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 27 Fed. Appx. 252.

No. 01-9403 COLLINS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 272 F.3d 984.

No. 01-9408 HERRERA TORRES v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 23 Fed. Appx. 842.

No. 01-9409 BRINKLEY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 20 Fed. Appx. 217.

No. 01-9413 PEREGRINO-LUJAN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 31 Fed. Appx. 833.

No. 01-9416 MOULTRIE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-9417 RAFEAL PEREZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-9419 RODRIGUEZ-CORONA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-9420 CASTELLANOS-GARCIA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 270 F.3d 773.

No. 01-9428 MORRIS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-9434 GRAVELY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 30 Fed. Appx. 132.

No. 01-9435 HUERTA-MENDOZA v. UNITED STATES; RAMIREZ-LANDERO v. UNITED STATES; ROBLES-ROBLES v. UNITED STATES; SANDOVAL-ENRIQUEZ v. UNITED STATES; PULIDO-MORENO v. UNITED STATES; and MARTINEZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 22 Fed. Appx. 893 (first judgment); 25 Fed. appx. 658 (second judgment); 25 Fed. Appx. 659 (third judgment); 22 Fed. Appx. 895 (fourth judgment); 23 Fed. Appx. 880 (fifth judgment); 23 Fed. Appx. 824 (sixth judgment).

No. 01-9436 ALLUMS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 31 Fed. Appx. 198.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
May 13, 2002
535 U.S. 1067 (2002)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 13, 2002

Citations

535 U.S. 1067 (2002)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Perez-Moreno

Perez-Moreno's first contention is that the district court erred by failing to give two requested jury…

U.S. v. Arnett

A trial court's decision to limit the scope of cross-examination is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.…