From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Apr 29, 2002
535 U.S. 1036 (2002)

Opinion

APRIL 29, 2002


No. 01-7449 CASTILLO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 273 F.3d 393.

No. 01-7468 ROOKS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 16 Fed. Appx. 244.

No. 01-7481 THOMPSON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 253 F.3d 700.

No. 01-7521 DUFORT v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 273 F.3d 1114.

No. 01-8013 SEATON v. CALIFORNIA. Sup.Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 26 Cal.4th 598, 28 P.3d 175.

No. 01-8119 LEBRON v. FLORIDA. Sup.Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 799 So.2d 997.

No. 01-8165 WILSON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 264 F.3d 1147.

No. 01-8540 BROWN v. HOBBS, WARDEN. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 20 Fed. Appx. 175.

No. 01-8550 CRITTENDEN v. CHUCKAWALLA STATE PRISON. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-8551 SANDERS v. OHIO. Sup.Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 92 Ohio St.3d 245, 750 N.E.2d 90.

No. 01-8554 MARBLY v. MAYOR, CITY OF SOUTHFIELD. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 26 Fed. Appx. 536.

No. 01-8558 SNYDER v. SCHRIRO, DIRECTOR, MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-8559 SAFOUANE ET UX. v. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 21 Fed. Appx. 780.

No. 01-8561 BAILEY v. McCOY ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. C.A. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 22 Fed. Appx. 546.

No. 01-8562 BAKKEN v. LEWIS, WARDEN. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Apr 29, 2002
535 U.S. 1036 (2002)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 29, 2002

Citations

535 U.S. 1036 (2002)

Citing Cases

State v. Philpot

In addition, appellee asserts that the jury was clearly informed that in order to find appellant guilty, they…

State v. Jones

However, we find the reasoning of the Ash Court persuasive and perceive no intent that the Counsel Clause…