From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 1, 2001
534 U.S. 860 (2001)

Opinion

OCTOBER 1, 2001


No. 00-10468 STARKS v. COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-10469 REESE v. CAIN, WARDEN. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-10470 BONDURANT v. COLORADO GENERAL ASSEMBLY ET AL. Sup.Ct. Colo. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-10471 MATHISON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-10472 LEVY v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 248 F.3d 1158.

No. 00-10473 BIRKHOLZ v. SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL COURT OF MONTANA, CUSTER COUNTY. Sup.Ct. Mont. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 304 Mont. 401, 26 P.3d 751.

No. 00-10474 MULAZIM v. CHAVEZ, CLASSIFICATION DIRECTOR, CORRECTIONAL FACILITY PROGRAM, ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-10475 KASKA v. HARRELSON ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 247 F.3d 247.

No. 00-10476 LICHTENBERG, AKA LICHTENBERG-COOKE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 238 F.3d 416.

No. 00-10477 MONTES-MANZANO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 253 F.3d 701.

No. 00-10478 ADAMS v. JACKSON, WARDEN. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-10480 MULLER v. SENKOWSKI, SUPERINTENDENT, COXSACKIE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 6 Fed. Appx. 58.

No. 00-10481 DAVIS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. D.C. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 235 F.3d 584.

No. 00-10482 REDMAN v. MARYLAND. Ct. App. Md. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 363 Md. 298, 768 A.2d 656.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 1, 2001
534 U.S. 860 (2001)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 1, 2001

Citations

534 U.S. 860 (2001)

Citing Cases

Whitney v. State

The Eighth Circuit held that the denial of a jury trial altogether is a structural error that, even under…

U.S. v. Holmes

Our review of the district court's ruling is de novo. United States v. Davis, 235 F.3d 584, 586 (D.C. Cir.…