From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Feb 19, 2002
534 U.S. 1154 (2002)

Summary

agreeing with the majority that "[p] roof of federal insurance is an essential element of the offense," but rejecting the majority's conclusion that the evidence was sufficient to prove that element as of the time of the alleged fraud

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Nieman

Opinion

FEBRUARY 19, 2002


No. 01-7666. SORTO-FUENTES v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 273 F.3d 1100.

No. 01-7668. LEWIS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 260 F.3d 855.

No. 01-7672. BYRD v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 17 Fed. Appx. 79.

No. 01-7673. BUGGS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7675. BORCHERS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 19 Fed. Appx. 471.

No. 01-7679. BERG v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7684. RIVERA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11h Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 273 F.3d 397.

No. 01-7691. TURCIOS-OLIVA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 273 F.3d 1101.

No. 01-7708. TAYLOR v. TEXAS. Ct. App. Tex., 6th Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 995 S.W.2d 279.

No. 01-7737. GALVAN-AGUILAR v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 273 F.3d 1098.

No. 01-7740. GUZMAN-JIMENEZ v. UNITED STATES; RAMOS-FLORES v. UNITED STATES; and GUERRERO-SUAREZ, AKA JIMINEZ ALVAREZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 273 F.3d 1101 (third judgment) and 1102 (first and second judgments).

No. 01-7744. WATTLETON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11h Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7762. CORPUS-DE LA RIVA v. UNITED STATES; MARTINEZ-ZAVALA v. UNITED STATES; and BARRIOS-RAMOS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 273 F.3d 1101 (third judgment) and 1102 (first and second judgments).

No. 01-7765. HOLMES v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Feb 19, 2002
534 U.S. 1154 (2002)

agreeing with the majority that "[p] roof of federal insurance is an essential element of the offense," but rejecting the majority's conclusion that the evidence was sufficient to prove that element as of the time of the alleged fraud

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Nieman
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 19, 2002

Citations

534 U.S. 1154 (2002)

Citing Cases

Webb v. State

" Because appellant's complaint on appeal does not comport with his objection below, we conclude appellant…

U.S. v. Rusan

While producing the actual certificate and proof of payment may be the ideal evidence to prove insured…