From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 1, 2001
534 U.S. 843 (2001)

Opinion

OCTOBER 1, 2001


No. 00-10121 MOORE v. ANDERSON, SUPERINTENDENT, MISSISSIPPI STATE PENITENTIARY, ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-10123 STEVENS v. McDANIEL, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-10126 CHARGUALAF v. TERRITORY OF GUAM. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-10128 SKIPPER v. LEE, WARDEN. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 238 F.3d 414.

No. 00-10131 CRAFT v. COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-10132 PETERSON v. COTTON, SUPERINTENDENT, PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-10133 PUGH v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-10134 CHOICE v. SOUTH CAROLINA ET AL. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 1 Fed. Appx. 253.

No. 00-10135 JAMES v. ATHERTON, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 242 F.3d 389.

No. 00-10136 DEVILA ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 216 F.3d 1009.

No. 00-10138 BUCHANAN v. NORTH CAROLINA. Sup.Ct. N.C. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-10140 STEINMAN v. 319 WEST 48TH STREET REALTY CORP. App. Div., Sup.Ct. N.Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 276 A.D.2d 355, 715 N.Y.S.2d 1.

No. 00-10142 SMITH v. CAIN, WARDEN. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 253 F.3d 700.

No. 00-10146 ULLRICH v. SNIDER, WARDEN. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 246 F.3d 682.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 1, 2001
534 U.S. 843 (2001)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 1, 2001

Citations

534 U.S. 843 (2001)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Valencia-Caicedo

" 46 U.S.C. app. § 1903(c)(1). The jurisdictional argument Valencia-Caicedo advances was rejected inUnited…

U.S. v. Sixto Richardo Salas Estupinan

" 46 U.S.C. app. § 1903(c)(1). The jurisdictional arguments Estupinan advances were rejected in United States…