From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
May 14, 2001
532 U.S. 1032 (2001)

Opinion

MAY 14, 2001


No. 00-9348. ULLOA-PORRAS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 246 F.3d 683.

No. 00-9351. VERGARA-SOSA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 246 F.3d 678.

No. 00-9352. GARCIA-TORRES v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 238 F.3d 424.

No. 00-9353. LOPEZ-PERDOMO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-9356. HERNANDEZ-VEGA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 235 F.3d 705.

No. 00-9362. DAVAGE v. SCOTT, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-9368. GOMEZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 247 F.3d 241.

No. 00-9369. HILL v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-9372. GEOHAGEN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 243 F.3d 542.

No. 00-9380. ALEXIS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Certiorari denied. Reported below: 232 F.3d 890.

No. 00-9382. RUX v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-9384. BUSH v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 221 F.3d 1356.

No. 00-9386. BROWN v. UNITED STATES. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 242 F.3d 372.

No. 00-9396. PARKER v. NORTH CAROLINA. Ct. App. N.C. Certiorari denied. Reported be.low: 140 N.C. App. 169, 539 S.E.2d 656.

No. 00-9398. TREVINO TUNCHEZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 247 F.3d 241.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
May 14, 2001
532 U.S. 1032 (2001)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 14, 2001

Citations

532 U.S. 1032 (2001)

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Miller

The purpose of Rule 10(b)(1) "`is to require a party to call the [trial] court's attention to a matter upon…

State v. Wilson

See State v. Holman, 353 N.C. 174, 540 S.E.2d 18 (2000) (holding that short-form indictment does not impinge…