Summary
affirming where ALJ interpreted limitation to "occasional or well-modulated criticism" as limitation to "brief supervision" with a preference for independent work
Summary of this case from Andrews v. U.S. Soc. Sec. Admin.Opinion
CIVIL NO. 2:12-CV-391-DBH
2013-10-15
JOHN CERICOLA, PLAINTIFF v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, DEFENDANT
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION
OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On September 24, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, his Report and Recommended Decision. The time within which to file objections expired on October 11, 2013, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED.
SO ORDERED.
_______
D. BROCK HORNBY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE